Dating the book of acts

The first six chapters are the history section, telling of a Jew named Daniel of royal descent, who was taken captive along with the rest of the people from the city of Jerusalem.

King Nebuchadnezzer placed Daniel (among others) in his service, and had them trained.

Prophets weren't necessarily men who only foretold the future, but spoke the inspired words of God.

The book of Daniel (composed by the man, the prophet Daniel) itself claims to have been written in the sixth century BC, indirectly.

It is very likely that he himself would be referring to historical sources, such as Jeremiah, which uses the Palestinian dating system.

Why would he have strayed from such an important and well-known prophet to use another, obscure dating system, which would appear to contradict Jeremiah, to his readers who read from, and knew the prophets work well (Waltke, pg. The second main historical argument concerns Belshazzar.

The Manichean Psalter, which contains some allusions to the content of Acts Andr.

(Allberry 1938: 142, 143, 192), establishes the 3d century as the terminus ad quem for the redaction of the apocryphon, but the Acts had to have originated earlier, between 150 and 200, closer to 150 than to 200.

The evidences are counter-arguments which use recent archaeological findings to prove that Daniel is correct, and our previous information was incomplete.Critics using this argument see a conflict between this verse and Jeremiah 25:1, where he refers to "the fourth year of Jehoiakim," whereas Daniel 1:1 refers to the same event occurring in the "third year of the reign of Jehoiakim." This apparent error is actually a cultural difference of dating systems.Jeremiah, a Palestinian, naturally uses the Palestinian dating system, which would place Jehoiakim's fourth year in 605 BC Daniel, using the Babylonian system, places Jehoiakim's third year in 605 BC (Harrison, pg. This apparent error can easily be used against critics, in support of the sixth century date of writing, with two arguments.As for the historical arguments, there are four main contentions.The first has to do with the reference to Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel 1 :1 .

Search for dating the book of acts:

dating the book of acts-87dating the book of acts-23dating the book of acts-7dating the book of acts-52

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “dating the book of acts”

  1. Jednocześnie model reklamowy zakładał wyedukowanie osób, do których pozyskiwano kontakty, w zakresie aktualnego stanu rynku nieruchomości oraz możliwości sprzedaży określonych typów nieruchomości.